What a gem. If you liked Knives Out, Clue, and Murder By Death, this is the movie for you! The story takes place in 1950’s London. In the story, some producers have decided to make a movie version of Agatha Christie’s play ‘The Mouse Trap’ (which is still running in London after more than 50 years, by the way). The cast of characters include a despised director ( Adrian Brody), a rookie constable (Saoirse Ronan, as an innocent appearing but smarter-than-you-thought PC Stalker, the rookie detective who steals the show!) and an alcoholic world weary detective (Sam Rockwell). The movie has to be delayed when a member of the cast is murdered! Some of my favorite suspects included Shirley Henderson (remember her as Moaning Myrtle in the Harry Potter series?), David Oyelowo and Ruth Wilson. This is all very tongue-in-cheek and includes puns, play on words, literary allusions and the breaking of the fourth wall. I also enjoyed the references to 50’s movies. One highlight is an appearance by Agatha Christie herself and a trippy take on the old mystery trope “The butler did it.” This is another movie that won’t be around in theatres long , so if you want to see it in a theatre, stop reading this review and get going! You will be glad you did!
Little Women
“Little Women” is a classic novel written in 1869 by Louisa May Alcott. There have been many movie versions made, and I am pretty sure I have seen them all. I have read the book every few years since I was 12; so it was with a skeptical eye that I approached this latest iteration of a beloved novel. I LOVED IT. Greta Gerwig has told a familiar story (keeping very close to the original source material), but has made it seem fresh and new. The story takes place during the Civil War. The March sisters are played wonderfully by Saorise Ronan, Emma Watson, Florence Pugh, and Eliza Scanlen, They are frequently left to their own devices while Father (Bob Odenkirk) fights in the war and Marmee (Laura Dern) tends to the local poor, The action picks up when the sisters meet Mr. Lawrence, their gruff but kind-hearted neighbor (Chris Cooper) and his handsome son, Laurie (Timothee Chalamet) – who is destined to love one sister, but marry another. Meryl Streep is Aunt March, the rich relative who hires Jo (Saorise) to be her “companion” in return for a promised tour of Europe. There is a an innovation, though, that some people may not like. The story is told in flashbacks, not in the linear way of the original novel. This may be confusing if you are not familiar with the book, but I didn’t think it took anything away from the story. If you are familiar with the story, disregard what some people have been saying in reviews, Gerwig did not change the ending of the book so Professor Bhaer definitely makes an appearance. All this version does is add the publishing of the book “Little Women,” which is alluded to at the end of the original. Whether you are a newbie, or know the story backwards and forwards, you will laugh and cry with Louisa May ALcott’s delightful characters brought to new life by Greta Gerwig.
Mary, Queen of Scots
This is the second “queenly” movie I have seen in as many weeks, the previous being “The Favorite.” Both movies depict an era of history that I am very fond of. I really wanted to love these movies, but they both let me down. ” The Favorite” was a way better movie, but I really don’t recommend either one. I found “Mary, Queen of Scots” to be very boring, which is not easy to do with all of the rich history that occured in this time period. Saoirse Ronan and Margot Robbie do a pretty good job of depicting these two great, regal cousins. The historical events are basically accurate, with the exception of a very contrived meeting, that never occured! (the director and writer say there could have been a secret meeting. Not very likely in an era when monarchs were accompanied at all times and their courts knew where they were.) The meeting was given a rather modern and nonsensical cast and really begged the issue of the rift between the two queens. In the movie, Mary and Elizabeth have this secret meeting that leads Elizabeth once and for all to lock up her cousin, who shows a remarkable lack of acumen for a woman who otherwise was a worldly and intelligent monarch. There was of course alot more to the rift that ended with the execution of Mary Stewart! Mary became Queen of Scotland when she was six days old due to the death of her father, but spent her formative years in France, where she eventually married the Dauphin. When he died, she returned to rule Scotland as an adult – yet in the movie, she has a thick Scottish brogue! I won’t go into the details of her history with her cousin. Elizabeth, and her Scots nobility. It’s a very complex and murky story, with many plots and intrigues afoot, including some poor choices made by Mary herself. The movie depicts some of these, but in a confusing way that manages to make them seem uninteresting. The murder of her private secretary was dramatic and intense, as were several depictions of skirmishes. I think if you were not familiar with many of the events in this story, you might be confused as to the reasons for some occurances, like the murder of her husband, Lord Darnley. Just too much is not effectively explained or fleshed out. The costume designer might have done a better job with less leather and inaacurate hair stying. Look for a few surprises though, David Tennant and Guy Pearce are very effective as John Knox and Sir William Cecil. Both had make up that was so well-done I didn’t recongize either of them. Maybe they preferred it that way… I enjoyed Margot Robbie’s performance as Queen Elizabeth, but her time on screen was comparatively brief. If you know absolutely nothing about Mary, Queen of Scots, this movie will at least introduce you to the basic facts of her rule and her tragic death. Otherwise, you would probably be better served by reading a good biography.