‘First Man’ is a well made film that explores the mostly forgotten aspects of the story of Neil Armstrong, the first man on the moon. It is a pretty accurate portrayal of not only the steps NASA’s space program went through to reach that goal, but also the emotional toil the space program took on Armstrong and his family. We are given an in-depth look at how the astronauts trained and what it was like to be in an early space capsule. I learned a lot about Neil Armstrong (as portrayed by Ryan Gosling) that I didn’t know. He comes across generally as an emotionally stunted stoic, barely talking to his wife and sons, terse and distant with his peers; and yet the movie touchingly depicts his soft vulnerable side too. To Armstrong, going to the moon was not a big ego trip to become a celebrity; it was his job. I understand that some people are up in arms because the movie doesn’t show Armstrong actually planting the American flag on the moon; and have implied that this movie is insufficiently American-centric, or even anti-American. Those are definitely people who have not seen the film and perhaps should actually see it before commenting (the flag is shown on the moon in background, and there is scarcely any way the events can be portrayed as done by anyone but Americans). I do not want to spoil the film, but there is another focus of this movie that comes out, something else that happened up there. This isn’t a movie for everyone though. It is not as exciting or fast paced as say “Apollo 13” or even “The Right Stuff.” I was also disappointed in the way Claire Foy, playing Armstrong’s wife Janet, was underused. I do understand this wasn’t her story, I just wished she had been given more screen time. All in all I think anyone interested in the early days of the space program will want to see this movie.
Red Sparrow
Do you get excited when you hear a movie is full of graphic and sadistic torture scenes? Have you always wanted to see Jennifer Lawrence completely naked? Do you look forward to a movie with a terrible script? If you answered ‘yes’ to each one of these questions, Red Sparrow is the movie for you. Unfortunately, I answered ‘no’ and did not care for this movie. The trailers make Red Sparrow sound like it will be an interesting, thoughtful movie. If only the trailer writer could have written the script! There are some very gruesome special effects to help explain why promising ballerina Dominika Egorova (Lawrence) is sent to Sparrow School, aka Whore University, by her sleazy uncle. Sparrow school teaches you how to become detached from your emotions so that you can have sex as one of many methods of controlling or eliminating potential informants and enemies (the movie seems to focus mainly on the first method though). The ultimate goal is gain information for the Russian government. It takes almost 2 1/2 hours to get to the minor plot twist pay-off. This movie wastes some good actors, like Joel Edgerton, Jeremy Irons, Charlotte Rampling, Mary-Louis Parker and Ciaran Hinds. With this talent, I expected more, but got so much less!
Silence
I want to start out by saying that Martin Scorsese is one of my favorite directors. From ‘Casino’ to ‘Good Fellows,’ from ‘Shutter Island’ to ‘Hugo,’ he has never disappointed me. So it is with a heavy heart that I must not recommend this movie. The plot sounded intriguing: the true story of Portuguese missionaries in Japan in search of their missing mentor at a time when Christianity is outlawed and priests are forbidden. A lot of people, including me, may not be familiar with this period of history. It took Scorsese 28 years to bring Shusaku Endo’s acclaimed book to the screen; and the scenery, costumes and cinematography are indeed breath taking. However, the story of two men hiding and starving for a great deal of the movie doesn’t make for a pleasant viewing experience for the theater goer. There are scenes after scenes of people being killed in gruesome ways, of the poor peasants suffering and the inability of the two priests, handcuffed by their Jesuit orthodoxy, to actually be of help. This movie is depressing from beginning to end. I would wait to see it at home, when you can break up this 160 minute movie into smaller chunks. I can not fault the acting of Andrew Garfield, Adam Driver, Liam Neesan, Ciaran Hinds or the heartbreaking performance by Tadanobu Asano, the “Johnny Depp” of Japanese Cinema. His portrayal of the man who seems to worship and yet betray the priests is incredible. This is the kind of movie that might win some awards, but most people will not want to watch it to find out why. If I love a movie, I want to see it again and again; this was not one of those movies.