Mary Poppins returns! I think we were all looking forward to this movie! And while I may have a few concerns, I still found it quite enjoyable. Lin-Manuel Miranda and Emily Blunt put in a great effort; they have great energy and voices and are very endearing. The special effects and costumes were dazzling. I even enjoyed the opening song. So how could a movie with all of this going for it, end up not quite getting there? “Mary Poppins Returns” really had several strikes against it before it even started. First of all, the orginal Mary Poppins was so well-loved and has been a classic ever since it first came out. So this movie had to live up to some pretty lofty expectations, and that’s a very high bar to reach. Next, the original movie had toe-tapping songs that you sang as you left the theatre. Who can forget the catchy earworm “Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious?” Or the joy of “Let’s Go Fly a Kite?” Or the sweet sadness of “Feed the Birds?” Third, Julie Anderews sparkled as Mary Poppins and had the singing range to hit those high, operatic notes. Last of all, the movie had heart. The newest reincarnation would probably find a more apprecative audience if we had never seen the original. But we did, and so we can’t help but judge this new one by comparing it to the older one. Sorry, but the newer one comes up short. I would say one of the biggest disappointments is the songs. I can’t remember one, even the one at the beginning that I liked. Yes, there was one about a book and another about going up with a balloon, but I don’t remember any of the lyrics or melodies. I found the grown up Michael Banks to be rather dim-witted and ineffective, you didn’t end up ‘rooting’ for Ben Whishaw like you did for David Tomlinson. The plot was not involving or even mildly tense. I love Meryl Streep, but she was utterly wasted as a cousin of Mary Poppins named Topsy whose presence was suppose to be a hommage, I suppose, to Ed Wynn’s “I Love to Laugh” in the original. I am not saying this is a bad movie, I think kids who haven’t seen the original will love it, and I did enjoy the performances of the two leads. There are also cameos by Dick Van Dyke and Angela Landsbury that I found delightful. I just wish I found the rest of the movie as charming.
Mary, Queen of Scots
This is the second “queenly” movie I have seen in as many weeks, the previous being “The Favorite.” Both movies depict an era of history that I am very fond of. I really wanted to love these movies, but they both let me down. ” The Favorite” was a way better movie, but I really don’t recommend either one. I found “Mary, Queen of Scots” to be very boring, which is not easy to do with all of the rich history that occured in this time period. Saoirse Ronan and Margot Robbie do a pretty good job of depicting these two great, regal cousins. The historical events are basically accurate, with the exception of a very contrived meeting, that never occured! (the director and writer say there could have been a secret meeting. Not very likely in an era when monarchs were accompanied at all times and their courts knew where they were.) The meeting was given a rather modern and nonsensical cast and really begged the issue of the rift between the two queens. In the movie, Mary and Elizabeth have this secret meeting that leads Elizabeth once and for all to lock up her cousin, who shows a remarkable lack of acumen for a woman who otherwise was a worldly and intelligent monarch. There was of course alot more to the rift that ended with the execution of Mary Stewart! Mary became Queen of Scotland when she was six days old due to the death of her father, but spent her formative years in France, where she eventually married the Dauphin. When he died, she returned to rule Scotland as an adult – yet in the movie, she has a thick Scottish brogue! I won’t go into the details of her history with her cousin. Elizabeth, and her Scots nobility. It’s a very complex and murky story, with many plots and intrigues afoot, including some poor choices made by Mary herself. The movie depicts some of these, but in a confusing way that manages to make them seem uninteresting. The murder of her private secretary was dramatic and intense, as were several depictions of skirmishes. I think if you were not familiar with many of the events in this story, you might be confused as to the reasons for some occurances, like the murder of her husband, Lord Darnley. Just too much is not effectively explained or fleshed out. The costume designer might have done a better job with less leather and inaacurate hair stying. Look for a few surprises though, David Tennant and Guy Pearce are very effective as John Knox and Sir William Cecil. Both had make up that was so well-done I didn’t recongize either of them. Maybe they preferred it that way… I enjoyed Margot Robbie’s performance as Queen Elizabeth, but her time on screen was comparatively brief. If you know absolutely nothing about Mary, Queen of Scots, this movie will at least introduce you to the basic facts of her rule and her tragic death. Otherwise, you would probably be better served by reading a good biography.
The Favorite
This movie seemingly has everything I love in a good historical movie: great costumes, fantastic sets, stellar acting,interesting plot, intrigues and crisp writing. And yet, I can not give this movie a golden apple. Let’s start with what ‘s good. The three main actresses pull off an acting coup. Olivia Coleman is spot-on as dumpy nearsighted English Queen Anne, who lets her favorites dictate her political decisions. Rachel Weisz is equally compelling as the Queen’s long time favorite, Sarah Churchill (Winston’s grandmother), the Duchess of Marlborough. She schemes to stay in favor and control of the monarch, and is deliciously ruthless. Emma Stone shows surprising depth (to me anyway) as Sarah’s cousin, a down on her luck aristocrat who ditches her morals, but gains the Queen’s ear. Everything is very satirical and tongue in cheek, with delightful bitchy dialogue. The decadence of the last Stewart court and the conniving and back stabbing is delicous to watch. However, I didn’t enjoy the way the movie plays fast and loose with historical facts. Queen Anne is given to hedonistic escapades that probably have no basis in facts. I found that whole aspect of the film rather seedy and I am definitely no prude. Queen Anne is portrayed as something of an imbecile, which also doesn’t seem to be based in fact either. Many kings had their favorites and exchanged sex for favors, so I do not have a problem if that is what Queen Anne did, but I just don’t like the way her affairs are portrayed in the movie. The other thing lacking in this movie is someone to root for. There are definitely no heroes or heroines for that matter to root for. Excpt maybe the rabbits.
Widows
This movie wasn’t exactly what I thought it was going to be. I thought it was going to be a revenge movie about a bunch of widows who get back at some baddies who apparently killed their husbands after a botched heist. I was way off! What ‘Widows’ turned out to be is a complicated character-driven movie with a few well turned plot twists. Viola Davis plays Veronica Rawlins, married to career criminal Harry Rawlins (played by Liam Neeson). He was the mastermind who planned a number of successful heists, and took care of everything…until this one went wrong. He and his henchmen are killed, leaving their wives not only alone, but out of home and a living, In the meantime, Colin Farrell’s character is running the usual duplicious campaign for alderman against a local black community leader, Jamal Manning (Brian Tyree Henry), who is also a crook. His brother, played by Daniel Kaluuya of ‘Get Out’ comes after Veronica and the other widows. It seems the money Liam Neesen may have stolen was Jamal’s. He needs the money to win the elction over Colin Ferrell. He is not ready to give the widows any mercy, and the pressure is on. Everyone in this movie has a secret, and no one is wholy innocent. But the most noble characters appear to be the widows, who are forced to perform a robbery in order to save their lives and families. It is rare that a movie of this genre plays out with well-developed characters. It is not just another cops and robbers movie. It has a very film noir feel to it. If you are looking for a very adult movie, that is definitely not a happy holiday movie, you may want to check it out.
The Grinch
I think the following exchange sums up my feelings about this movie. There was a mom and her son (he looked to be around 4) sitting next to us in the theatre. About halfway into the movie the boy turns to his mom and says. “I don’t like this movie, can we go home now?” Hey kid – I’m with you! I wasn’t going to see this movie at all, but I thought with Benedict Cumberbatch voicing the Grinch, maybe he would be up to the task, or at least add one reliably interesting element. I was wrong. You might remember how Jay Ward and the Warner Brothers deftly crafted their comedy cartoons so there were elements that appealed to the adult, some that appealed to the kid, and some that covered all the bases. This writer and his team definitely weren’t able to do this. That being said, if you are a kid between the age of 5-10, you might find this a somewhat enjoyable holiday entry. I must say that except for a scene of the Grinch shopping in town (his interactions with the townspeople are WAY off Suess’ script), he never seemed very mean or even that scary. He’s bland, homogenized into a pale imitation of the original. The otherwise pointless inclusion of a cliched giant moose character probably helped them expand it from the television half hour to a movie length story. The new music is pedestrian, not very catchy; but the worst is the reimagined Cindy Lou Who who is now an incredibly spunky hockey playing girl with an equally incredibly saintly single mother. This one should have Dr. Suess rising from the grave faster than Jacob Marley’s ghost! If I had a child or grandchild who was in the right age range for this movie, I still wouldn’t take them to see it. Instead, we would microwave some popcorn, snuggle under a nice warm blanket, and watch the original made for televsion version. Boris Karloff – you are missed!!
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- …
- 57
- Next Page »