“Nightmare Alley” is a gritty remake of a 1947 movie based on a book of the same name. It is filmed in black and white which gives the film a dark and evil look. It perfectly fits the plot. This is a depressing movie about the sad lives of misfits working for a rather sad carnival in the 1940’s. In bygone days, people could make a living by being freaks or having some pretty cliched acts, such as Ron Perlman who plays the world’s strongest man; or David Strathairn who has a mind reading act, when he isn’t drunk, with his wife played by Toni Collette. One of the bigger draws of the carnival is the resident wild beast man/geek who readily and eagerly devours a live chicken for the entertainment of the masses. How someone ends up being such a geek is disgusting (and hopefully long gone relic of those bygone days). The story starts with Stanton “Stan” Carlisle (Bradley Cooper), whom we see burning down his midwestern shack of a house after putting a body in a hole in the floor. The reason for this inexplicable act will become clear by the end of the movie. Fade to Stan wandering into a cheap carnival during a rainstorm, and being offered temporary employment as a sort of roustabout. He makes himself very useful and is befriended by some of the carnival denizens and joins the company. At first he takes any job he can fill. But eventually he develops his own clairvoyant act (which he may or may not have stolen from Strathairn’s character) and jazzes up a geek act for Molly (Rooney Mara). He manages to overcome her initial aloofness and gain her trust. He then decides to try his luck away from the carnival and lures sweet, innocent Molly (who he’s made into an assistant, or accomplice!) into coming with him. All is not as it seems though. Of course, Stan’s act is nothing more than a con. Molly is a shill. After a few years, they are somewhat successful, but a chance encounter with Dr. Ritter (Cate Blanchett) changes their fortunes and ultimately their lives. We’re talking big money here. Or are we? This is NOT a happy story and you will probably be repulsed at points. By the jars of preserved, grotesque, babies who died at birth, for example. Even so, this is a top-notch thriller which also includes performances by Richard Jenkins (the victim of the ultimate scam, which brings everything tumbling down), Willem DaFoe, and Mary Steenburgen. Romina Power, daughter of Tyrone Power – who played Stan in the original – cameos as a viewer of Stanton’s show, but I didn’t know which person she was. Maybe you will. The set designs and settings are terrific! Guillermo del Toro directs a cinematographically scrumptious movie, but I can’t give it a golden apple for two reasons. First of all, it was too long and kind of lagged in the middle. Second, the ending was just too depressing (and you may figure the ending out before it arrives). However, if you are a fan of film noir from the 40’s and 50’s, I think you will enjoy this psychological thriller.
Last Night in Soho
“Last Night in Soho” is an interesting thriller that moves between London’s Soho of the 1960s and the present time. Thomasin McKenzie (JoJo Rabbit) plays Ellie, a country girl who has moved to London in order to study fashion designing. Ellie has some kind of presight, and sees things that aren’t ‘there.’ She sometimes sees visions of her mother, who committed suicide when she was 7. Thomasin brings to life the innocent girl in the big, wild city in a sympathetic and believable way. After moving in with a party girl room mate, and discovering she is the leader of a clique of ‘mean girls,’ Ellie decides to find a place of her own. She ends up in an old, creaky apartment owned by Dame Diana Rigg (in her last movie appearance). Things begin to go really wrong. Ellie sees visions of a mysterious girl named Sandy (Anya Taylor-Joy) who seems to be living the high life in the swinging sixties. She has aspirations to be a singer and falls under the sway of Jack (Dr. Who’s Matt Smith), who appears to be a friendly fun guy who seems to have the “ins” to help her get started. These dreams turn into nightmares as Jack shows himself as a real creep, bordering on pimp, who wants to absolutely control Sandy. Ellie believes she is seeing through her dreams the events that lead up to Sandy’s murder. And the lines are starting to blur between dream and reality. I won’t say more, but there are some delicious twists a la Alfred Hitchcock. The costumes are stunning and the soundtrack is mesmerizing. The recreations of “swinging” Soho are atmospheric and evocative. The whole thing was conceived and directed by Edgar Wright, who also helmed “Shaun of the Dead” and co-authored “Ant-Man.” I think this is his best movie to date. If you are obsessed with the 60’s like I am, you will enjoy the eerie and earthy quality and cinematography. The story is a little slow to start, but once it gets going, I think it will have you hooked until it comes to a most bizarre conclusion.
Old
M. Knight Shyamalan is the kind of writer/director that you either love or hate. I happen to fall on the “love” side of the equation. When he is on point, his movies are thrilling, thought provoking and entertaining (think ‘The Village’ or ‘Sixth Sense’). When he is off, his movies are quite unsatisfying, and even silly (‘The Happening’ and the atrocious “Last Airbender’ come to mind). This newest entry falls somewhere in the middle as far as I am concerned. If you have seen any of the trailers, you know this film is set on a beautiful beach; an idyllic and peaceful tropical setting. A family has come to a rather special resort; and they, along with a few other guests, have been offered the opportunity to enjoy this secluded spot. It isn’t long before they find that things are going terribly wrong. They find out the seclusion is total – they can’t leave the beach, they can’t even call out! And the people on this beach are aging at a terrifyingly fast rate. Why is this happening? Is this a freak of nature or is there a sinister human source? The fun of the movie, like all of Shyamalan’s movies, is to try to figure out what the ultimate revelation is going to be. I was really enjoying this movie until it came to its somewhat unsatisfying conclusion. I didn’t feel the ending lived up to the hype of the rest of the movie, it was definitely anticlimactic. So is it worth going to see? If you are a fan of Mr. Shyamalan (who wrote, directed and acted in “Old,” which is based on a graphic novel of the same name), I would give it a look. If you are not a fan, you will probably want to wait on this one.
A Quiet Place Part II
Wow! What a deifference a week makes. Last week, our theatre was nearly empty. Today, the theatre was quite full; it seemed almost like pre COVID times! It looked like every group of viewers had only one “socially distanced” space between them. Many people were excited to see John Krasinski’s follow-up to his successful “A Quiet Place,” and so were Bill and I. This was a very worthy sequel! Emily Blunt, playing Evelyn Abbott once again, gives an amazing performance as a mother trying to keep her three children (including a baby) alive in a world overrun with aliens whose goal seems to be to utterly destroy the human race. The catch is that these aliens are basically blind but have super=sensitive hearing. Any small sound is enough to alert them-even from a good distance away! In order to survive, people must stay quiet. Abbott has even found a way to keep her baby quiet with a pretty ingenious “pacifer.” If you didn’t see the first movie, no worries. John Krasinski gives you a little recap of how this whole thing started. He creates a dystopian sort of post-alien massacre world where isolated humans can only eke out a meagre, desparate existence. In this movie, Blunt meets up with Cillian Murphy, a family friend, who reluctantly agrees to help them. The two kids, played by Millicent Simmonds and Noah Jupe, give gut-wrentching performaces as the two older kids. A favorite of mine, Djimon Hounsu makes an unfortunately short appearance. I found this movie highly suspenseful, keeping me on the edge of my seat for the entire time. If you enjoyed the first movie, you will love this one too. If you didn’t see the first one, you won’t be disappointed with this sequel!
The Little Things
Yay – our local theatre at Arundel Mills is back in business! We were there for the re-opening, so to speak, since it was the first Saturday the county allowed it to be open in several months. Everything is looking good, and the management is doing a great job. As you can imagine, there were some technical difficulties with starting everything back up. The movie was delayed about 20 minutes so the manager gave everyone a free pass to a future movie for our inconvenience. (We really weren’t inconvenienced, but we’ll take it!). Now to the movie. “The Little Things” stars Denzel Washington as a small town deputy sheriff, Joe “Deke” Deacon, who used to be a big deal detective in Los Angles. Something bad happened during his last case in Los Angeles and he ended up losing his wife, having a heart attack, and having to leave under a dark cloud. Whatever it was will keep you guessing until the end. He’s back in LA on a routine assignment to pick up a piece of evidence, and is delayed and sort of tags along with the current hot shot detective Sgt. Jim Baxter, played by Rami Malek. Baxter is facing a possible serial killer and it seems his case may be related in some ways to a cold case of Deke’s. Jared Leto is his usual weird and creepy villain who may or may not be the sadistic serial killer. Denzel is at his quiet best, and he and Rami finesse their impromptu alliance well. Jared excels in his portrayal of the odd and subtly maleficent suspect. My friend, Dava, says this movie reminds her of “Seven,” starring Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman, with Kevin Spacey. I tend to agree. If you enjoyed “Seven”, are fans of Denzel or Rami, or like to predict what will happen next, this is the movie for you.