This movie is a love letter to the fans of the original PBS series. It has everything we would want, and maybe even a little more. It’s 1927 and the Crawley family is back along with their beloved staff as they prepare for a visit from King George and Queen Mary. Every character has a story line of some kind, as everyone plays their part to help make the visit a success. Jim Carter (Carson), as always, brings a dignity to the whole house as he is persuaded to leave retired life for a few days to get the house, and downstairs staff, in spit-spot shape. He manages it all in spite of the arrival of the most obnoxious set of Royal Household staff, arrogant and disdainful of their country contemporaries. This gives Mr. and Mrs. Bates (Brendan Coyle and Joanne Frogget) a wonderful story line that involves some ingenuity and a great deal of nerve, that I absolutely loved! There are several budding romances, and some in the most unlikely places, and even a couple of new stories. Happy to say that Maggie Smith is back as Lady Violet, the Dowager Countess, and as deliciously snarky as ever. Everything is done perfectly – script, settings, costumes, and witty, witty banter. There is humor and warmth, intrigue and all the bits of the long gone life of the country gentry of pre-World War II Britain that continue to fascinate modern folk. If you didn’t watch Downton Abbey at all, I think you will still find much to hold your interest and even entrance you, for the movie can stand on its own. This is for the fans, though, and I must say I enjoyed this immensely. “I am an expert in every matter,” says Violet at one point. I assume she means the quality of movies too, and who am I am to disagree with a Dowager Countess?
Lawrence of Arabia
Wow! they don’t make them any more like this 3 hour and 40 minute epic that details the true events in the life of British officer T. E. Lawrence during World War I. This movie won 7 Oscars in 1962 and totally deserved each and every one. For some reason, I had never seen the whole movie. So when I had the opportunity to see it this week at Arundel Mills Mall, I jumped at the chance. You are probably wondering what is so great about a movie that needs almost 4 hours (it went by really fast) to tell its story? The plot revolves around T. E. Lawrence, an eccentric British officer who speaks seven languages and is a Middle Eastern scholar. He is seconded to the British Arab Office to observe the Bedouin tribes that Prince (later King) Feisal is trying to unite to take their land back from the Western powers. But, this is happening during the First World War, and the British want to use the Arab forces to tie down, or even defeat, the Ottoman Turks, who are allied with Germany. Lawrence ends up with the unenviable task of uniting scattered and warring Arab tribes so that they can contribute to this strategy. He does it by sheer force of will and example. In the end, he discovers more about himself than he likely wanted to. That he is able to achieve so much, feel so much and think so much, all through the force of his personality, is brilliantly portrayed by Peter O’Toole in his very first major movie. His portrayal of the quirky, often misunderstood, but driven and tortured genius and leader is superb! He is supported by such acting heavy weights as Anthony Quinn, Omar Sharif, Jose Ferrar, Claude Rains, Jack Hawkins and the great Sir Alec Guiness. Even if you have never heard of these amazing actors, you will want to see more of them after the movie is over. Everything about this movie is epic- and it all works. The editing, costumes, scenery, writing and directing- it is all there and more so, especially Maurice Jarre’s marvelous and inspiring score. Even though it was just in the theatres for one night, I highly recommend that you purchase the DVD or see if it is offered on any of the streaming or pay services. It is totally worth it.
Mary, Queen of Scots
This is the second “queenly” movie I have seen in as many weeks, the previous being “The Favorite.” Both movies depict an era of history that I am very fond of. I really wanted to love these movies, but they both let me down. ” The Favorite” was a way better movie, but I really don’t recommend either one. I found “Mary, Queen of Scots” to be very boring, which is not easy to do with all of the rich history that occured in this time period. Saoirse Ronan and Margot Robbie do a pretty good job of depicting these two great, regal cousins. The historical events are basically accurate, with the exception of a very contrived meeting, that never occured! (the director and writer say there could have been a secret meeting. Not very likely in an era when monarchs were accompanied at all times and their courts knew where they were.) The meeting was given a rather modern and nonsensical cast and really begged the issue of the rift between the two queens. In the movie, Mary and Elizabeth have this secret meeting that leads Elizabeth once and for all to lock up her cousin, who shows a remarkable lack of acumen for a woman who otherwise was a worldly and intelligent monarch. There was of course alot more to the rift that ended with the execution of Mary Stewart! Mary became Queen of Scotland when she was six days old due to the death of her father, but spent her formative years in France, where she eventually married the Dauphin. When he died, she returned to rule Scotland as an adult – yet in the movie, she has a thick Scottish brogue! I won’t go into the details of her history with her cousin. Elizabeth, and her Scots nobility. It’s a very complex and murky story, with many plots and intrigues afoot, including some poor choices made by Mary herself. The movie depicts some of these, but in a confusing way that manages to make them seem uninteresting. The murder of her private secretary was dramatic and intense, as were several depictions of skirmishes. I think if you were not familiar with many of the events in this story, you might be confused as to the reasons for some occurances, like the murder of her husband, Lord Darnley. Just too much is not effectively explained or fleshed out. The costume designer might have done a better job with less leather and inaacurate hair stying. Look for a few surprises though, David Tennant and Guy Pearce are very effective as John Knox and Sir William Cecil. Both had make up that was so well-done I didn’t recongize either of them. Maybe they preferred it that way… I enjoyed Margot Robbie’s performance as Queen Elizabeth, but her time on screen was comparatively brief. If you know absolutely nothing about Mary, Queen of Scots, this movie will at least introduce you to the basic facts of her rule and her tragic death. Otherwise, you would probably be better served by reading a good biography.
The Favorite
This movie seemingly has everything I love in a good historical movie: great costumes, fantastic sets, stellar acting,interesting plot, intrigues and crisp writing. And yet, I can not give this movie a golden apple. Let’s start with what ‘s good. The three main actresses pull off an acting coup. Olivia Coleman is spot-on as dumpy nearsighted English Queen Anne, who lets her favorites dictate her political decisions. Rachel Weisz is equally compelling as the Queen’s long time favorite, Sarah Churchill (Winston’s grandmother), the Duchess of Marlborough. She schemes to stay in favor and control of the monarch, and is deliciously ruthless. Emma Stone shows surprising depth (to me anyway) as Sarah’s cousin, a down on her luck aristocrat who ditches her morals, but gains the Queen’s ear. Everything is very satirical and tongue in cheek, with delightful bitchy dialogue. The decadence of the last Stewart court and the conniving and back stabbing is delicous to watch. However, I didn’t enjoy the way the movie plays fast and loose with historical facts. Queen Anne is given to hedonistic escapades that probably have no basis in facts. I found that whole aspect of the film rather seedy and I am definitely no prude. Queen Anne is portrayed as something of an imbecile, which also doesn’t seem to be based in fact either. Many kings had their favorites and exchanged sex for favors, so I do not have a problem if that is what Queen Anne did, but I just don’t like the way her affairs are portrayed in the movie. The other thing lacking in this movie is someone to root for. There are definitely no heroes or heroines for that matter to root for. Excpt maybe the rabbits.
Operation Finale
This movie is a rather low-key political thriller based on a true story. In this compelling tale, set in 1960, the Mossad, Israel’s nascent intelligence agency, has gotten information that the notorious Adolph Eichmann, the architect of the “Final Solution,” is alive and living under an assumed name in Argentina along with his wife and sons. Many Nazi’s escaped Germany at the end of World War II, but Eichmann was one of the higher level SS escapees avoiding justice, and one that had an especially central role in the adminstrative machinery of the Holocaust. Oscar winner Ben Kingsley plays Eichmann in a stellar performance, showing the facets of a man who sought to escape the responsibility for what he’d done, but was still haughty and arrogant while maintaining a familial gentility with his own people. The philosopher Hannah Arendt coined the term “the banality of evil” referring to Eichmann, and Sir Ben’s performance demonstrates how apt the characterization is. Oscar Isaac ably performs the role of Peter Malkin, one of the Israeli agents tasked with bringing him in, with subdued passion and intensity. After the Israeli government decides to kidnap Eichmann and take him to Israel to stand trial for his extensive war crimes, a tense cat and mouse game ensues between the Mossad agents and the ex-patriate Nazis and their sympathizers among the Argentinian politicians trying to find them and end their mission. Why they must do this and how it is accomplished makes for an engaging movie. If you are interested in WWII history and how this Nazi war criminal was brought to justice, you will definitely enjoy this film.